↑ Return to Tools available

BPR

 

  • ·         BPR, from Thomas Davenport and Michael Hammer, appeared in the early 90s with the aim of redesigning whole processes, even whole organisations

 

  • ·         BPR was said to be needed when a dramatic and perhaps unexpected change highlighted an organisation’s weaknesses e.g. a hostile take-over bid, the loss of a major contract, market share suddenly decimated – major change was urgent, hang the risks

 

  • ·         BPR was ‘the fundamental rethinking and radical redesign of business processes to achieve quantum leaps in critical measures of performance’

                   

  • ·         BPR started with current products or services offered and asked how you would provide them if you were to start from scratch

 

  • ·         You had to ask ‘why do we do what we do at all’ and identify wasteful activities, especially those that had nothing to do with meeting customers’ needs

 

  • ·         BPR tended to focus on core operational processes leaving other corporate and supportive processes to continue as before, efficiently or inefficiently

 

  • ·         BPR could involve major organisational upheaval and result in job losses, even though that was not its stated aim, so it was generally unpopular with workforces

 

  • ·         Some organisations, like direct insurance companies, made great gains by employing new processes and technology to drastically reduce order cycle times and administration costs

 

  • ·         But most judged BPR to take too long (like TQM) so they lapsed into their ‘old ways’ and/ or to be too much for them, so they looked elsewhere for improvement

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>