More than 10 years ago, a beer commercial captured the essence of how to look busy. Staged as a scientific lab, the humorous spot described its new invention, the fake steaming cup of coffee. This innovation allowed a bored employee to sneak out of the office to catch a baseball game or go to the bar, while co-workers and, most importantly, the boss remained impressed by the employee’s so-called dedication. Even though the employee was not at his desk, his steaming mug of coffee was, and that was enough to convince everyone he was there.
As with most humor and parody, there is a kernel of truth in this commercial. It focuses on the inaccurate definition of work as being equal to face time: If you’re in the office, you are working, but if you’re elsewhere, you can’t possibly be.
This concept has always been a fallacy, and there are myriad examples of how people have found ways to not work at the workplace. There’s even an entire subgenre of articles on how to look busy at work. And the reverse of this was also true — if you weren’t at the office, you couldn’t possibly be working. In fact, there were even pointers on how to do that effectively.
But here we are, emerging from a year in which almost everyone was sent home and companies had to review every aspect of their operations in light of a pandemic. It was a turning point.
Prior to 2020, we were already well on the way to establishing virtual workspaces with improvements in meeting and collaboration technology that allowed people to work from anywhere and connect with clarity.
But what has been slower to evolve is the definition of work. As employees struggled to do their work from their home office, kitchen or bedroom, many were forced to contend with the needs of children, pets and other family who had no concept of the traditional 9-to-5workday. This did not sit well with some managers, who believe that work cannot be done in pockets of time but must fit the contiguous 9-to-5framework.
But the 9-to-5model never worked. Physiologically, it is not possible for any human to deliver eight hours of consistent, high-quality output per day. Even those who try will succumb to the natural rhythms of the body, which delivers peaks and troughs of energy. According to Inc, “Research suggests that in an eight-hour day, the average worker is only productive for two hours and 53 minutes.” The rest is filler, disguised as overly long meetings, excessive emails and checking social media.
Kaizen For Knowledge Workers
To redefine work, we should first look back to the scientific studies done by Toyota in the development of continuous improvement (kaizen), just-in-time manufacturing and lean manufacturing, all of which focused on the smoothing of the workflow through the identification and elimination of muda (wasteful habits), muri (unreasonable work placed on people and operations) and mura (unevenness and irregularity).
These concepts can be applied to knowledge work delivered in the modern office.
We’ve had a transitional year that proves that work can be done in locations other than the office. We are still able to meet, communicate and collaborate. And the opportunities provided by virtual workspaces allow individuals to curate a schedule to deliver their best work while addressing muda, muri and mura.
Resetting And Redefining Work
This last year also offers itself as an opportunity to reset; an opportunity to redefine work. Managers and staff can look at the nature of work as blocks of focused time that may occur at different times of the day — and in which the outcome is valued more than any number of contiguous hours elapsed.
Such a change demands heightened amounts of trust, genuinely felt and copiously demonstrated, with managers empowering employees to deliver. That, too, is possible in a dynamic and virtualized workspace.
One final point: Part of the aforementioned commercial’s humor came from the fact that the “steaming coffee mug” was being marketed to employees who really did not want to be at the office. The work held no appeal. The mug was their tool for escape.
This bodes the question as to why a job should represent 40 hours a week of boredom, when engagement and empowerment generate far superior output.
A new definition of work can be one that embraces the human elements of passion, respect and autonomy — and these become the new raw materials for quality deliverables, even if the hours worked by each team member vary to better fit their own lives.
The technology exists to make this happen. It is now up to management to envision work in terms of output rather than process. This is how we redefine work for the future.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
3 comments
The above is very true and been exemplfied in multiple cases as wella s the virtualisation of work as a result of mass work form hom eor from anywhere as it so happened in many cases. However, there is one aspect that remains how will assembly line workers or retail assisatnts work from home? What will be the machine human interface and the human to human itnerface in the trasnactiona nd production of goods and services. In the end not everything can be digitally delivered nto consumed virtually like Netflix or even a book on a kindle. We focus on perhaps the 20-25% of work that is done in the form of knowledge whcih can be done virtually, what of the rest?
Author
Jose
Many thanks for your comments and I agree with you – as an ex British Steel employee, I fully recognise there are many industries which cannot employ WFH, even though AI and robotics are increasingly being used there – note their impact on car production lines – and given developed economies now comprise some 80% services, and AI/ robotics are being increasingly used on their front lines/ in warehouses/ in back offices/ in professionals’ offices, then I’m not sure about your 20-25% estimate for ‘knowledge work’ at present
The good news is the trend is for less hours input needed per employee per week, with a three day week on the horizon, leaving us with more time for leisure and pleasure – the bad news is that interesting, well-paid jobs may also be trending downwards, but maybe a nation’s welfare systems in future will ensure that people affected have enough money so they don’t have to work and can do what they want to do, for no money, so they end up happier too
Interesting times indeed!
Cheers
Dick
You are right about the numbers being higher than 20-25% however many of these are not knowledge workers but support like delivery drivers and healthcare and retail customer facing like hospitality and entertainment . Agree that work hours may fall as work becomes more about selected tasks and the 9-5 is no longer logical, wages will fall as they have done the the financial crisis. There is a two or may be a three tiered wage system, and if you loomT platform workers they are often in a precarious situation no guarantee if work or even of a living wage.
But the idea being talked about of a universal basic income may do as you suggest, i.e. you and I work three days and the UBI fills the gap… Not sure the greed will allow this equitable system or how it would be financed. Being tried in Finland and Denmark.